Read the Book, and Do the Lab

Read the Book, and Do the Lab

Jeff may be surprised, but I have remembered something that he said when we were doing weekly Bible studies a few years ago. We covered several books of the Bible, and I can’t remember what was the context for his statement, that all of our Bible learning should be linked to “labs.” That is, what we learn in the Bible, we should practice putting into practice.

I avoided classes that had labs if I could. I couldn’t avoid biology, so we had to study organ systems, and then we had to cut up the frog on a little stainless steel tray and discover what we already knew from the book. I was a history major in college, and while labs are possible, they were not common. I was assigned to study the writings of Washington Gladden housed at the Ohio Historical Society. I read some of his sermons, which I think qualifies as a lab, and did not reach much of a conclusion because of the weakness of my effort. I learned later that he was a Social Gospel preacher who linked salvation with social action, not so much a salvation from sin against God, but salvation as human efforts to cure societal ills - clearly not the Gospel. I didn’t know this from my reading, but from others who actually read and understood. I should have failed the lab.

Jeff says that in church, there is much more Book than lab. He was not advocating ignoring the Book. But when a preacher preaches the Book, he also ought to give some assignments. I suppose those assignments could be to sit and think; to write out a confession, whether of sin or of faith; or to obey what is commanded; or to parse out what should be the attitude that accompanies a promise (if God says, “I will be with you,” a promise, then how should that affect our thoughts and our moods, especially in the midst of trial?). What if every sermon had an assignment? What if we knew when we left the room what it is that we are supposed to do with what we have just heard? Because, as the Bible says, it’s not just the hearing, but the doing.

It’s been some time since Jeff and I sat down together. It’s been a long time since I’ve heard his common-sense statement that the Book demands a lab assignment. And I have to confess, I haven’t done much with it. This is no good excuse, but I’m very comfortable being a Book guy. I can do without cutting up the frog. But none of us can do without responding to the Word.

This Sunday we will complete an exposition of Paul’s letter to Titus. The Pastoral Epistles, which includes Titus, have a high rate of imperatives (commands) in them. Do this and this and this, and don’t do this. Timothy and Titus are being given instructions on how to supervise local church ministry in their region or on their island. Paul tells Titus to be really clear about grace (Book), and to urge people to be involved in good works (Lab). He is clear that the grace precedes the good works, but that the good works are not optional. I think that might translate into something that sounds like, “Read the Book and Do the Lab.”

So as this Winter series called “Grace and Good Works,” (or, “Book and Lab”) closes this Sunday, let me give fair warning that there will be a lab assignment. Not only does the Lord want us to have our minds exercised, but He may also want us to get our hands dirty.

What is this confidence that you have? (Is 36:4)

What is this confidence that you have? (Is 36:4)

One of the great stories late in Judah’s history is that of Hezekiah and God’s deliverance from the Assyrian invasion. Sennacherib is their king, and Rabshakeh is their spokesman. Those are big and hairy names. People might take you more seriously if you had a name like Rabshakeh. I would like to analyze his speech with you which is intended to frighten Jerusalem into submission.

The first thing that Rabshakeh points to is an inconsistency in the faith of Judah (Is 36:5-6). They say that they believe in God, and yet they have made an alliance for protection with Egypt. God has repeatedly instructed them to “trust in the Lord,” and yet they feel that they must shore up their defense by depending on ungodly nations. The Church does this when we rely on the world to accomplish our ends. Inconsistencies between what we say that we believe, and what we actually do, weaken us.

The second thing which is obvious about Rabshakeh is that he largely misunderstands Judah’s God and religion (Is 36:7). He points to Hezekiah as already undermining faith in God by removing the “high places,” which are sites of worship around Judah. But he does not know that those “high places” are actually places where false gods have been worshipped, and Hezekiah removed them in order to restore a focused reliance on the one, true God. The real tragedy is that the high places were even there in the first place. The Church is terribly weakened when we tolerate a worship of multiple gods.

The next tactic that Rabshakeh uses is to point to their military weakness (36:8-9). He brazenly offers to give to Jerusalem two thousand horses, but claims (correctly, I think) that Jerusalem could not find riders for those horses with the ability to confront the abilities of the Assyrians. The Church is not preserved through the world’s skills, as in money or marketing. Our strength is in God, in obedience to His Word, and in God’s provision. It seems that if the Church is regarded as strong according to worldly metrics, then the Church has wandered off her path.

Then Rabshakeh clearly states that he himself speaks for God (36:10). This is audacious, but it is also common. The Bible calls them false prophets, and false prophets can inhabit the halls of education, finance, government, and corporations. Some of the most effective false prophets are religious leaders. It is easy to claim to speak for God. But there is an easy test. The Church must continually study to compare such statements with God’s Word. God does not contradict Himself, and if someone contradicts God’s Word, they are indeed a false prophet.

Rabshakeh then paints a stark picture of impending doom if the city does not comply (36:11-12). They face suffering, humiliation and defeat. But once again, the Church should know that we have been given the end of God’s story, and that there are two ultimate outcomes, Heaven and Hell. Whatever may happen before that time, whether it be thriving or even martyrdom, is small in relation to the eternal outcome. The Church knows that to stand faithfully with our faithful Savior is the only proper path.

Powers of Observation

Powers of Observation

When I come home from visiting, my wife will ask me questions about colors or items I noticed. I don’t notice much of anything. However, I am able to notice details in Scripture text after years of practice.

In the television show “Elementary” from about ten years ago, Sherlock has powers of observation different than the ones above. He notices small things that most people would not notice. So does God. God’s Word does not describe God’s notice as the same as mine or my wife’s, or Sherlock’s. But God’s powers of observation are noted in several places. I’ve traced some it by searching out “small things.”

God notices the smallest of details in His Word, the Scriptures. It is common today as people wanting to preach the “gist” of Scripture without attention to the specifics. I think it allows them to shave the “rough” edges from God’s Word, though I would argue that it is the “rough” edges with which we need to struggle. The”Word-as-received” addresses hidden offenses more effectively. Here is what Jesus says: Matt. 5:18 “until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.”

God’s judgment is also impartial, so much so that, as it says in Deut. 1:17 ‘You shall not show partiality in judgment; you shall hear the small and the great alike.” God instructs His people to judge in this way because He judges in this way. He is not bound by our estimation of what is a “big” sin or a “significant” sin or an an especially “bad” sin. All sin is an affront to God’s holiness.

The entrance to God’s salvation is small: Matt. 7:14 “For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.” The path to God is exclusive. Jesus famously said, John 14:6 “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.” It would be fair to translate this verse “I am the only way.” It is narrow as opposed to the broad way that accepts every notion of man’s mind that imagines what God ought to accept. But man’s open-minded opinion contradicts the statement above about the small gate and the narrow way.

But also, God accepts all kinds of people for salvation. God’s powers of observation, demonstrated by Jesus, notice the poor and the blind, the rejected and the outcasts. Remember how Jesus noticed with His divine powers of observation the woman at the well and the woman with the issue of blood. He noticed the small child and the criminal on the adjacent cross. He noticed the one man in the tree that everyone else wanted to ignore: Luke 19:3 Zaccheus was trying to see who Jesus was, and was unable because of the crowd, for he was small in stature. 4 So he ran on ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree in order to see Him, for He was about to pass through that way. 5 When Jesus came to the place, He looked up and said to him, “Zaccheus, hurry and come down, for today I must stay at your house.”

God sees things that others do not see. He sees you and the things that you wish other people would notice and the things that you wish other people wouldn’t. But He sees, and His regard for you and your concerns is not governed by the false notion of “bigger is better” that has captivated our culture. Oh, God is indeed great, but He notices that which is not.

Everyone in Distress, in Debt, or Discontented (1 Samuel 22:2)

 Everyone in Distress, in Debt, or Discontented (1 Samuel 22:2)

I may be the weird one, but this little triplet from David’s experience of fleeing Saul grabs me. The alliteration helps, but I am impressed again with how God works so much differently than does the world.

Think of an exercise in team-building. Maybe you could think of building a church staff. How are you going to go about it? You might start with a careful description of the skills needed, but then you move on to the personalities and psychological profiles are needed to fill all the seats on the bus. Yes, that is the kind of language that is used in the popular business books, and yet I am not sure at all that building a church staff or building a team has much to do with who sits where on a bus. When I ride the shuttle bus from the parking lot to the airport, I could not care less whether someone is a lion or an otter, extrovert or introvert, Type A or B or Z - everyone looks straight ahead; no one talks, and we just hope to get off the bus.

David, on the run from Saul with his life at risk, desperately needed a team. He was able to form such a group, though it seems he never consulted LinkedIn. This group which at one time numbered 600 men were drawn to him perhaps as much by their own personal distress as due to their respect and admiration for David and his reputation. They had lost everything, though we are not sure how. Perhaps the Philistines had taken their land and perhaps destroyed their families. Whatever victories Saul had been able to gain, it had not spared them their dire circumstances. And so they came to David.

But they must have known something of the one to whom they were coming. This was the man who, when a boy, had defeated Goliath. This is the one who was challenged to calm Saul’s evil spirit with music. He was the poet who sang to the sheep, and seemed to treat people as well or better than those sheep. He is the one who would be known as the Shepherd/King. Though not yet a king, these men saw something in David - that he would shepherd them, and they were willing to pledge their lives and service to him.

But there were rough, very rough. They were fashioned into mighty warriors, and probably had plenty of raw material available for that quest, but they were also prone to wanton violence and interpersonal conflict and greed and the immoralities that go along with it. David would have to patiently and carefully disciple them to be those who would reflect his own character and then help them to be conversant with God’s way rather than man’s ways. It would take time, and some would leave and die in their sins.

Corporate style teams cannot afford this much time. They need sterling resumés to start with, and each person needs to gain a following soon after. But David lovingly struggled with some of these men for the rest of their lives. I wonder what would happen if we saw “local church” more in David’s terms than that of “this present evil age (Gal 1:4)”

This Mob-ocractic Spirit

This Mob-ocractic Spirit

It is dangerous to pluck a phase from the news, but not quite so dangerous if the phrase showed up in a speech back in the earlier 1800’s by Abraham Lincoln quite a while before he became President and thus before the Civil War. He included it in a speech to a group of young men and spoke of the duty of preservation of liberty, not so much out of passion, but in rational and reasonable ways.

A preceding event prompted Lincoln’s warning and his use of the term, “mobocratic,” evidently used from time to time by others, but new to me. The tragedy was the lynching of a black man by a white mob, which, you would agree, was a terrible violation of liberty of the individual by many who were certainly not much interested in preserving liberty.

When we turn to the Bible, as we should, we find mobs at work in various settings. The mob in Jerusalem rose up against the prophet Jeremiah when he did not parrot the party line. The people had been assured of “peace and safety,” and Jeremiah was predicting imminent judgment. They threw him into a muddy pit.

The heads of the religion department in Jerusalem complained to Jesus about the praise He received from the “mob” as He rode into Jerusalem on a donkey. Those shouting “Hosanna!” would have seen this as participation in public worship and would have certainly rejected the term “mob.” Does it merely depend on one’s perspective? “One man’s mob is another man’s worship throng?” I don’t think so. Jesus’ worshippers were not throwing stones. They were not demanding death and destruction. They were praising Jesus, God’s Son.

But there was another mob, only days later, who would chant “Crucify Him! Crucify Him!” to the Roman governor, Pilate. Yes, that would be a mob, individuals caught up into destructive activity, driven by passion, and with little reason or reasonableness. Yes, they were concerned about the preservation of their “old” religion in the face of this powerful prophet and teacher, and Jewish exiles would continue to persecute Christians throughout the Book of Acts. They were so caught up in the zeitgeist of the moment that they were unable to soberly consider what the Old Testament clearly said. They were driven to an action for which they will have to answer to God Himself one day.

But doesn’t that apply to us as well? Won’t we be judged when we fail to reflect on Scripture and to consider what is indeed Christ-like as opposed to the prevalent “spirit of the age.” It is not so much that we are to think for ourselves (I don’t know how successfully we ever do such a thing - we have very few “original” thoughts), but we should know who and what we are following. What we are committed to follow if we call ourselves Christians is the Word of God upon which we soberly reflect and learn in concert with other believers (not a mob).

I believe the devil loves to incite a mob, and he does so with a cleverness that fools us often. The phrase “everyone’s doing it” is almost a definition of mobocracy, following the crowd, lending your passions but leaving your brain at home. It has happened in Biblical times and it still happens today. Democracy is one thing. Mobocracy is something much more dangerous. And mobocracy is deadly for the testimony of Jesus Christ and of His Church.

Whiter than Snow

 Whiter than Snow

There is a beautiful verse in Isaiah 1 that uses snow’s whiteness as a word picture. I don’t know how in the world that phrase came to mind here at the halfway point of February, but let’s not talk about the weather. Let’s talk about the Gospel.

The verse goes like this: Is. 1:18 “Come now, and let us reason together,” Says the LORD, “Though your sins are as scarlet, They will be as white as snow;”

The last two lines are actually found in poetic form in the Bible text. “White as snow” is a pretty good illustration, not of whiteness, but of purity.

The problem was that as Isaiah was writing, Israel was anything but pure. Here is his poetic description: Is. 1:4 Alas, sinful nation, People weighed down with iniquity, Offspring of evildoers, Sons who act corruptly!” Come now, Isaiah, tell us what you really think. But remember, this is not Isaiah’s observation. It is God’s, which Isaiah was then led to write.

Not only were they dirty, but they were sick. “The whole head is sick, And the whole heart is faint. From the sole of the foot even to the head, There is nothing sound in it.”

And then, there is nothing that Israel could do about it. They were not able to work or buy their way back into God’s favor. They could do all the religious rituals they could dream up, but it would be to no avail.

That’s the bad news. The bad news is needed before we are ready to hear and appreciate the good news. Without the bad new, the good news does not strike us as being all that good. The bad news states that Israel was anything but pure; disqualified from any kind of covenant relationship with the holy God.

The good news talks about these stained people becoming “white as snow,” pristine and pure and thus acceptable to God. It is a picture of purity, but it requires us to ask the question, “how?” If they can not do it themselves, then how is it to be accomplished? We will find the answer in the text that I gave above, but only in part. Here is the whole thing: Is. 1:18 “Come now, and let us reason together,” Says the LORD, “Though your sins are as scarlet, They will be as white as snow; Though they are red like crimson, They will be like wool.” Not only do we have the word picture, “white as snow,” but also this simile: “like wool.” I suppose we normally think of wool as white, though I’m not sure that is its import here. Wool does not fall from heaven as does snow. It comes from a sheep, from the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.

So both pictures are important. Jesus, the Son of God, came down from heaven (like snow) for the express purpose of bringing cleansing to His people, that is, those who would accept His gift. And the way that He did it is by Himself becoming the sacrificial lamb (wool) who would "bear in His own body our sins on the tree, so that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By His wounds we are healed” (1 Peter 2:24). That’s the good news. White as snow, and reconciled into a relationship with the God of the universe, which is why you exist.

Staph Meeting

Staph Meeting

I was sitting all alone in a coffee shop with this laptop, deep in thought about something or other. A couple of older ladies sat to my left. I’m not sure how old, maybe my age. But then I saw him, a man with a book, a discussion book. He started to pull some tables and chairs together just to my right. Oh no! He’s getting ready for a staph meeting.

It was not my intention to listen to either the left side or the right. But if I had to hire someone, I would definitely go with the two ladies on my left. They were friends and talked about this or that. One of the things the one mentioned was trying to show some younger people how to get something done, as though these ladies could actually get things done. What a concept!

The tall guy getting ready for his meeting kind of gave himself away. Not only was it the Patrick Lencioni book on organization and leadership (who also wrote the classic, “Death by Meeting,” which was about to be played out just to my right). It was his loafers with no socks. It had snowed that morning, and the compulsion to be cool totally overwhelmed any instinct for common sense. Eventually the group gathered, three women and, finally, a young man. There was some small talk, and then the real issue came to the fore.

I suspected that they were a church staff before they even began churching. There’s just something about that crowd that gives them away, similar to how old, grouchy Baptist pastors are easy to spot. The pastor, that is, the cool dude, started it off by, well, talking about himself.

And that is what the meeting was mostly about: self. They were all supposed to have a list of what makes them most happy in ministry, and the longest segment was the pastor’s talk about what he enjoyed most. They were each to contribute, and around the circle they went. Not a single one mentioned getting paid, though I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t have been there otherwise.

Now let me step back from my negativity and cynicism for just a moment to make a point. For each of those staff members, there was nothing that they said that made me think they were not sincere. They were doing as instructed, and I think they most likely truthfully mentioned things that they enjoyed in ministry. It’s not wrong. It is just not what it is all about. I so wanted the Apostle Paul to attend that meeting and tell what he most enjoyed. What was it, Paul, the imprisonments or the stonings or the shipwreck? Oh, he wouldn’t have said that, but he would have changed the question to something like this: What is it that makes Jesus most happy related to this ministry with which you are involved? Your feelings are not to be central. Jesus is.

And so the fault wasn’t with the staff members, but with the leader, who liked to talk about leadership, but never talked about leadership the way the Bible talks about, not as leadership but as servanthood. Servants don’t talk about what they enjoy and don’t enjoy all that much. They talk about Jesus, and they talk about others. So that’s how you turn a staff meeting into a staph meeting.

Worm’s Eye View

 Worm’s Eye View

I learned in art class about perspective, and the difference between the worm’s eye view vs. the eagle’s eye view. The picture will look much different depending on the chosen perspective.

I’ve been reading a collection of sermons written by Christopher Love of England in the 1600’s. He died in his 30’s, so you can see that I am willing to take counsel from younger men, so long as they are dead. The title of the sermon series (and the book) is The Dejected Soul’s Cure. Its a real pick-me-upper.

But the book is honest and wise, and the author, like Spurgeon two hundred years later, is given to word pictures.

The question being examined is why a person who desires to live a holy life focuses more quickly on his faults than his goodnesses. He views his life more from the perspective of a worm’s eye view than that of the eagle. I would guess that a certain number of you would know what I am talking about. Sin is a constant and obvious problem to those who wish to be holy. Certainly we know that pattern of holiness displayed in descriptions of God’s character and as played out in the life of Christ. But we are also convicted about how far we fall short.

Love says that “God’s people see their sins like Mountains, and their graces like mole-hills.” That is not how God sees us, but it is how we tend to see ourselves. There is no sin so mountainous that God will not forgive, and His grace is sufficient for a complete covering. If Noah’s waters covered the mountains, God’s grace can cover our worst sins (according to our own estimation, which is faulty).

But the battle is hard. Love says “my lusts burn like a flame, but my graces like a glowing coal.” It is a view born in a moment, and we cannot see that God can quickly douse a wildfire, and that He will also nurse along a glowing coal.
There are people in the world capable of writing a great list of all their successes, and have little memory to jot down but a failure or two. Not so with many who pursue godliness. “Grace is as the gleaning of the Vintage; sin is as the full harvest.” You know the difference, don’t you? The gleanings are the few stalks left around the edges and corners of the field. The full harvest is greater by far. That is how it seems for those who live with a hunger for God, and also have a keen sensitivity with regard to sin in their own hearts.

Sunday at our Lord’s Table service we will sing the hymn “Grace Greater than our Sin.” Verse two sings “Sin and despair, like the sea waves cold, Threaten the soul with infinite loss;
Grace that is greater, yes, grace untold, Points to the refuge, the mighty cross.” While the serious but dejected soul says “my sins (seem) at full tide, but my graces (seem) at a low ebb,” the Gospel argues against the dejected soul, telling him that “where sin abounded, grace did much more abound." It is not that you are so much better than you thought yourself to be. No, you were probably quite right about yourself. It is rather that your Savior is so much greater than you have imagined. Verse 3 of “Grace Greater” sings “Dark is the stain that we cannot hide; What can we do to wash it away? Look! There is flowing a crimson tide, Brighter than snow you may be today.”

Great Cry and Little Wool

Great Cry and Little Wool

It won’t surprise you, if you have read recently, that I am dipping from the well once again of C.H. Spurgeon and his John Ploughman’s Pictures. The artwork at the beginning of the present chapter shows a man shearing his animal in order to collect wool. The problem is that he is shearing, not a sheep, but a pig. That explains our title, in that the pig gives “great cry” but “little wool”.

The first application is to our pursuit of pleasure. Listen to the critique: “There is noise enough - laughter and shouting and boasting; but where is the comfort which can warm the heart and give peace to the spirit? Generally there’s plenty of smoke and very little fire in what is called pleasure.” If our entertainment makes us miserable, perhaps we are seeking to gather wool from a pig.

But then one could speak of the entertainment that takes place at church. Is this also an end in itself? Of course, there are different types of churches, and thus different types of entertainment. For some, it might be the band. For others, the preacher or homily. For others, the people with whom they rub shoulders and exchange conversation. It might be the experience of the grand cathedral, or even the joy of watching the children. Each and all of these most likely have less to do with entertainment described in our chapter as “all fizz and bang and done for.” You carry the experience with you as you exit the doors and resume normal life. I pray that it is deeper, touching not only the senses but also the soul. And for the churches seeking to draw crowds as though they were a stadium or coliseum, you may just get what you deserve: great cry and little wool.

Of course, there are other applications as well. Have you ever heard a person laugh loudly, not because of happiness but because they merely wanted people to believe that they were happy? Wouldn’t it be better just to find the true source of happiness and enjoy it rather than pretending? Or perhaps worse, the person who grumbles and complains about the miseries of their life, and, lo and behold, we find their life is not all that bad. Why not focus on what is good instead of bad? Why not be thankful for the blessings? The persons who plays the martyr may soon find a response from others that secretly hopes your martyrdom finds success. Great cry and little wool. It is present in politics and marketing and the workplace and in our own souls.

The Sheep has been sheared and He has given His wool. We don’t have to shear it ourselves. What we must do is to embrace the proper Resource, not a pig, but the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, and find in Him what is good and true and beautiful.

Don’t Cut Off your Nose to Spite your Face

Don’t Cut Off your Nose to Spite your Face

 
Spurgeon, in the voice of John Ploughman, says ”Anger is a short madness. The less we do when we go mad the better for everybody, and the less we go mad the better for ourselves. He is far gone who hurts himself to wreak his vengeance on others. The old saying is, ‘Don’t cut off your head because it aches,’ and other says, ‘Set not your house on fire to spite the moon.’"

This little chapter on Anger in “John Ploughman’s Pictures” says it better than I can, so here are some more quotes:

• “Do nothing when you are out of temper, and then you will have the less to undo.”
• “Let a hasty man’s passion be a warning to you; if he scalds you, take heed that you do not let your own pot boil over.”
• “He who cannot curb his temper carries gunpowder in his bosom, and he is neither safe for himself nor his neighbors.”
• “When passion comes in at the door, what little sense there is indoors flies out of the window.”
• “Anger does a man more hurt than that which made him angry. It opens his mouth, and shuts his eyes, and fires his heart, and drowns his sense, and makes his wisdom folly.”

From whence does anger come? Those who are angry are quick to blame others. “You make me so mad!” But that is not the truth, is it? Anger is our response to the situation, but anger is not a necessary response. A person could just as soon respond with patience, or a desire to see whether one’s own self has contributed to the problem, or with an attitude that you would like to help the person who is in the wrong. Anger does none of those things.

So again, from whence does anger come? Do you remember that Jesus Himself already answered that question? 

Mark 7:20 And He was saying, “That which proceeds out of the man, that is what defiles the man. 21 “For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, 22 deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. 23 “All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man.” 

You might argue that you do not see “anger” in this 13-fold list, though I might find it in the entries “evil thoughts” and “murders” (since, when one is angry, we often think that we would be better off if the other person were absent). But let’s compare this list, “which proceeds out of the man,” to the “works of the flesh” in Galatians 5:

 Gal. 5:19 Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20 idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, factions, 21 envying, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these, of which I forewarn you, just as I have forewarned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.

 Spurgeon says, “A hot-tempered man would be all the better for a new heart, and right spirit.” That fits the Matthew text well. To accord with the second text, we might say that the angry person needs the Lord. Why? Because merely trying harder not to be angry will never work. We cannot change our own hearts, and we cannot conjure up the Spirit. They are both given by Christ to those who have given up on self-salvation and come to Him for the only real help available.

The Value of a Mirror

 The Value of a Mirror

I have spoken recently of figures of speech, and the Bible is full of them. James talks about a man looking in a mirror, but as soon as he walks away, “he has immediately forgotten what kind of person he was” (Jas 1:24). Spurgeon in his John Ploughman’s Pictures tells a similar story. He describes showing a mirror to a blind man so that he can see the soot on his face, which is, of course, fruitless. But he goes on to say, "the man without eyes has the advantage for he is in the dark and he knows it."

We found last Sunday that the man born blind in John 9 could actually see some things much more clearly than those who were fully sighted. He could see that there was something different about Jesus, that He was a prophet and a man come from God. He could see in Jesus an authenticity that led him to belief in Jesus as the Son of Man, something that others simply could not or were not willing to see. Spurgeon goes on to tell of other forces that lead sighted people to blindness.

One such condition is simple unreasonableness or willfulness. Some would call it being mule-headed and stubborn. There is an arrogance to it as well. Spurgeon concludes, “We pity the poor blind; we cannot do so much as that for those who shut their eyes against the light.” I have wondered about Jesus’ figure of speech in the Sermon on the Mount about not casting pearls before swine. I think it might fit here.

“Prejudice shuts up many eyes in total darkness.” Pre-judging means that a person has already made up their mind. Arguments will likely do no good. Spurgeon gives the curious illustration: “when he has said a thing he sticks to it like a cobbler’s wax.” I have to confess that I’m not sure the role of wax in shoe repair, at least back in the 1800’s. More clear is: “one man can lead a horse to the water, but a hundred cannot make him drink.” Or, “he is as stubborn as he is stupid, and to get a new thought into his head you would need to bore a hole into his skull with a centre-bit.” (You can get away saying those things when you quote someone who is dead.)

So what is my excuse of your excuse for failing to heed the mirror of the Word you have heard, the truth you have seen, and yet have not responded with appropriate action? We wouldn’t think of going about with soot on our faces, but then we may go about with soot in our hearts, knowing full well that Jesus said that out of the heart come all kinds of evil things. We wouldn’t fail to respond to warning signs from the car that we are driving, but we ignore the warning signs given by the Spirit and the lack of comfort and assurance with God that go with it. In fact, we can become almost used to it. And so, we pray for one another, as Spurgeon does, in these verses:

A dark and blinded thing is man Yet full of fancied light!
   But all his penetration can Produce no Gospel light.
Though heavenly truth may blaze abroad, He cannot see at all;
   Though Gospel leaders show the road, He still gropes for the wall.
O Lord, Thy holy power display, For Thou the help must find:
   Pour in the light of Gospel day; Illuminate the mind.
Behold! How unconcerned they dwell, Though reft of sight they be;
   They fancy they can see right well, And need no help from Thee.
Speak, and they’ll mourn their blinded eyes, And cry to Thee for light;
   O Lord, do not our prayer despise, But give these blind men light.